如何赚积分 | 访问留言
客服热线:136364739
管理商铺 发布产品 发布求购 寻找商机
TOP
图揭美国工厂智能充气娃娃生产过程
[ 编辑:dhcmd | 时间:2016-12-27 21:24:02 | 浏览:2076次 | 来源:创业渠道网 ]
充气仿真娃娃演示图,充气仿真娃娃使用视频,中国娃娃充气实战图,充气娃娃之恋,充气仿真娃娃不遮图,充气仿真娃娃演示图,充气仿真娃娃使用视频,中国娃娃充气实战图,充气娃娃之恋,充气仿真娃娃不遮图
\n \n\\n \\n\\\\n \\\\n\\\\\\\\n \\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

资料图(图文无关)

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

原标题:五旬男骑行不慎身亡 家属告骑友索赔被驳

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

在一次集体骑行活动中,王某遭遇单方面交通事故,不慎摔倒身亡。其家属将与之同行的7名骑友以及北京某自行车协会(下称自行车协会)告上法庭,索赔147万余元。昨日,门头沟法院对该案作出一审判决,法院认定被告无责,驳回了原告的诉讼请求。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

■事发

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

参加骑行活动男子不幸身亡

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

53岁的王某是一名自行车骑行爱好者。去年9月,在一个骑友微信群中,张先生提出倡议,包括王某等在内的数名骑友响应,大家相约于12日开展往返门头沟的骑行活动。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

当日中午,由20余名骑友组成的车队到达门头沟安家庄附近河边,之后众人自助烧烤饮酒。下午1点半左右,活动基本结束,各路骑友随即散去,只剩下尚在睡觉的王某和张先生等7人。下午4时,王某睡醒,8人组成一路车队,沿109国道返回。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

骑行途中,王某因接打电话落在了队尾。不久,在王某前面的数名骑友先后收到路过汽车司机的提醒,后方有骑车的人摔倒受伤。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

众人调头返回,发现事故发生在落坡岭铁道口下坡处,事故现场车胎全爆,车架摔断,王某昏迷不醒。大家赶紧拨打急救电话,并拦截过路救护车。王某被送往门头沟区医院救治,但经抢救无效于当日死亡。经交管部门认定,当日王某发生了单方交通事故,原因不明。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

■起诉

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

7名同行骑友被告上法庭

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

今年9月8日,王某的父母和妻子以生命权、健康权、身体权纠纷为由,将张先生等7人以及某自行车协会诉至门头沟法院,索赔147万多元。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

在开庭中,王某家属认为,张先生等7人作为骑行活动的组织和具体参与者,未尽到妥善的管理协调、安全防护义务,更未尽到必要的照顾及注意的义务,未劝止王某饮酒。在王某事故发生时骑友无一人在现场,未采取任何积极有效的救护、帮助措施。同时,原告还认为,自行车协会对骑行活动未尽到组织管理监督职责,未履行安全保障义务。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

7名骑友答辩称,这次活动既非以“某骑行队”的名义组织召集,也没有队长和报名程序,这次活动是大家自发结伴而行,彼此之间不存在任何法律关系。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

另外,业余骑行并非专业竞赛,出于安全考虑,骑行运动中近距离结队放坡视为禁忌,更不可能如影随形彼此照顾。王某作为完全民事行为能力人,又是资深骑友,理应知道骑行安全要求。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

自行车协会辩称,自己是非营利性的民间组织,这次活动并非协会组织。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

■判决

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

骑友和协会被判无责

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

昨日,门头沟法院对该案进行宣判。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

法院审理认为,此次户外骑行活动的参加者之间无隶属关系,共同出资烧烤餐饮,不涉及经营或者盈利,属于自发式户外运动。活动的组织者应尽到安全保障义务,但该安全保障义务应有一定的合理限度。至于组织者张先生,法院认为没有权利和义务制止参与者自愿的饮酒行为,且尽到合理的安全保障义务。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

法院认为自发式户外运动的每名成员地位平等,虽有伙伴救助义务,但证据已经显示其履行了互相救助的义务。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

法院认为,此次骑行活动是骑行爱好者以微信作为联系工具自发组织的活动,某自行车协会既非此次户外骑行活动的发起者,也非组织者,故依法不应承担安全保障义务。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

最终,法院一审判决驳回王某家属的诉讼请求。

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\n\\\\\\\\n\\\\n\\n\n

京华时报记者王晓飞

】 【打印】【繁体】 【投稿】 【关闭】【评论】 【返回顶部
免责声明:本网站尊重并保护知识产权,根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》,如果我们转载的作品侵犯了您的权利,请在一个月内通知我们,我们会及时删除。充气仿真娃娃演示图,充气仿真娃娃使用视频,中国娃娃充气实战图,充气娃娃之恋,充气仿真娃娃不遮图
评论
称呼:
验证码:
内容:

相关栏目
"